I like this take! Man I think that mark's idea of making a publication at the end of this cohort is a very good idea, because i see a lot of cross-overs of pre-occupations in our work. Like I see this post of yours as being tangentially related to Bethany's post:
And I think putting the three together makes a really nice dialogue. Like Hal's take that people avoid knowledge of self, Bethany's take that people avoid knowledge of other and then struggle to connect, and then your take that you don't actually need to understand the issue at all.
A very keen observation! I read your comment and I was inspired to make an essay mixing the 3 ideas, but I just couldn't crack it. But I read Bethany's and Hal's posts and I agree with your statement. It is a nice dialogue :)
I like this take! Man I think that mark's idea of making a publication at the end of this cohort is a very good idea, because i see a lot of cross-overs of pre-occupations in our work. Like I see this post of yours as being tangentially related to Bethany's post:
https://bethanybtabor.substack.com/p/virtue-of-love-and-folly-of-knowledge?s=r
Which I thought also shared some interests with Hal's post:
https://survivalcomplex.substack.com/p/behind-the-mask?utm_source=%2Fprofile%2F81992167-hal-rondo&utm_medium=reader2&s=r
And I think putting the three together makes a really nice dialogue. Like Hal's take that people avoid knowledge of self, Bethany's take that people avoid knowledge of other and then struggle to connect, and then your take that you don't actually need to understand the issue at all.
A very keen observation! I read your comment and I was inspired to make an essay mixing the 3 ideas, but I just couldn't crack it. But I read Bethany's and Hal's posts and I agree with your statement. It is a nice dialogue :)